Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    An Exploration of Online Games for Adult Gamers 

    November 22, 2023

    Discovering the Elephant Sanctuaries in Bali and the Best Seasons to Visit

    November 8, 2023

    The Ultimate Guide to Buying Cheap Proxies: Everything You Need to Know

    October 19, 2023
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Cafe Madrid
    • Business
    • Technology
    • Startups
    • Services
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Guides
    • How to
    • Contact Us
    Cafe Madrid
    Home»Technology»Apple’s third-party payment proposal is not enough for Dutch regulators
    Technology

    Apple’s third-party payment proposal is not enough for Dutch regulators

    Shreya ChristinaBy Shreya ChristinaMay 2, 2022No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The Netherlands Authority for Consumers & Markets (or ACM) has reportedly rejected Apple’s proposed App Store changes that would allow dating app developers to use third-party payment systems, according to 9to5Mac and the App Fairness Coalition† The Dutch regulator ordered the change in December and has been talking back and forth with the company about how to implement it — and Apple has charged millions in fines along the way. Now Apple could face further fines.

    According to a tweet from a journalist translated by 9to5Mac, the regulator says Apple’s most recent proposal to let developers use third-party payment systems is an “improvement” on its previous ideas, but still “isn’t enough to comply with European and Dutch regulations.” Apple and ACM did not immediately respond to The edge‘s request for comment.

    Proponents fear Apple’s proposals would make using third-party payments difficult or unattractive

    Apple’s latest proposal, submitted on March 27, said dating app developers could use one of both a third-party payment system or Apple’s, not both, and that developers should warn users that they were about to interact with a system beyond Apple’s control. The same is true if the developer sends users to their site to complete a purchase.

    Apple also said developers who use alternative payment systems still owe the company a 27 percent commission on in-app sales, compared to the 30 percent it costs from most in-app payments using its own system. . (If the developers were making less than $1 million in annual revenue, that would be very unfavorable compared to Apple’s Small Business Program rate of 15 percent.)

    Apple had previously proposed that dating app developers – the only people affected by ACM’s order – should submit separate versions of their apps for the Netherlands. The plan in March dropped that requirement after the regulator rejected the previous proposal as “unreasonable”.

    In late March, ACM said it was evaluating Apple’s proposal after fined the company about $55 million. The regulator said it could impose “another cease and desist order (with potentially higher fines this time)” if it found Apple’s proposal insufficient. It had reviewed fines on a weekly basis and charged the company €5 million (about $5.6 million) each week – up to a maximum of €50 million (then about $55 million). Now that the limit has been reached, the regulator is reportedly working on additional penalties, because the originals “didn’t have the desired result”.

    The Coalition for App Fairness applauds ACM’s decision. The advocacy group is made up of companies like Epic Games, Spotify, Basecamp, and Match Group (which makes dating apps like Tinder, Match.com, and OkCupid) that oppose the App Store’s high fees and its role as the only place to buy software. available for iPhones and iPads. In a statement released on Mondaythe group said it “stands ready to support ACM as it continues to seek fair treatment and remedies for developers,” even as Apple “continues to dig closely to protect its monopoly power at all costs.”

    The coalition also said Apple’s rejected proposal “imposed unnecessary requirements that created friction with the aim of discouraging dating app developers from taking advantage of the ACM order.”


    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Shreya Christina
    • Website

    Shreya has been with cafe-madrid.com for 3 years, writing copy for client websites, blog posts, EDMs and other mediums to engage readers and encourage action. By collaborating with clients, our SEO manager and the wider cafe-madrid.com team, Shreya seeks to understand an audience before creating memorable, persuasive copy.

    Related Posts

    The Ultimate Guide to Buying Cheap Proxies: Everything You Need to Know

    October 19, 2023

    Discord plans to let creators sell downloadable products

    June 21, 2023

    How microgrids and smart homes are shaping our energy-independent future

    June 16, 2023
    Editors Picks
    8.5

    Apple Planning Big Mac Redesign and Half-Sized Old Mac

    January 5, 2021

    Autonomous Driving Startup Attracts Chinese Investor

    January 5, 2021

    Onboard Cameras Allow Disabled Quadcopters to Fly

    January 5, 2021
    Top Reviews
    Mobiles

    Review: T-Mobile Winning 5G Race Around the World

    9.1 By Shreya Christina
    Mobiles

    Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra Review: the New King of Android Phones

    8.9 By Shreya Christina
    Mobiles

    Xiaomi Mi 10: New Variant with Snapdragon 870 Review

    8.9 By Shreya Christina
    Advertisement
    Demo
    About Us

    We are the Simple News website that provide awareness & support to readers. If you find any news or article that belong's to you then contact us anytime, we will remove that things or give you best credit that help for your brand.

    We Accept promotional Articles

    Email : [email protected]

    Our Picks
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Tech
    • Gadgets
    • Mobiles
    • Buy Now
    © 2023 cafe-madrid.com

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.