Saturday, August 20, 2022

Judge refuses to remove Visa from Pornhub child porn case

Must read

Shreya Christinahttps://cafe-madrid.com
Shreya has been with cafe-madrid.com for 3 years, writing copy for client websites, blog posts, EDMs and other mediums to engage readers and encourage action. By collaborating with clients, our SEO manager and the wider cafe-madrid.com team, Shreya seeks to understand an audience before creating memorable, persuasive copy.

A federal judge refused to remove Visa from a lawsuit alleging it helped MindGeek, Pornhub’s parent company, monetize child porn. in a decision On July 29, U.S. District Judge Cormac Carney accuses the payment processor of refusing to cut business ties with MindGeek, despite Pornhub and other porn sites owned by MindGeek distributing child pornography. The lawsuit was filed by a woman whose underage videos were posted on Pornhub without her consent.

“If Visa knew that there was a significant amount of child porn on MindGeek’s sites, which the court must deem true at this stage of the proceedings, it was aware that it was monetizing child porn and money. transferred from advertisers. to MindGeek for ads playing alongside child porn, such as the plaintiff’s videos,” Judge Carney wrote.

Visa has argued that it is an “improper defendant” in the case and does not tolerate any illegal activity. “Visa condemns sex trafficking, sexual exploitation and child sexual abuse material as abhorrent to our values ​​and purpose as a company. This preliminary ruling is disappointing and misrepresents Visa’s role, policies and practices. Visa does not tolerate the use of our network for illegal activities. We continue to believe that Visa is an improper defendant in this case,” a Visa spokesperson wrote in a statement until Variety.

Pornhub and other porn sites owned by MindGeek regularly feature non-consensual or underage porn videos, according to recent reporting in both the and the . MindGeek has maintained that it has protocols in place to prevent the posting and re-posting of such illegal material on its site. In 2020, MindGeek banned all unauthenticated users from posting to its sites and removed millions of uploaded videos in the aftermath. In order to post on MindGeek properties, a user must submit their government ID to a third-party company and verify their identity.

“If the court can actually consider the facts, we are confident that the plaintiff’s claims will be dismissed for lack of merit. MindGeek does not tolerate any kind of tolerance for the posting of illegal content on its platforms and has put in place the most comprehensive safeguards in the history of user-generated platforms,” a MindGeek spokesperson wrote to Variety.

The Montreal-based company is in disarray after years of media coverage over what critics say is a flawed moderation process that allows illegal content to thrive on its porn sites. Both MindGeek’s CEO and COO abruptly in June. The company also has an unspecified of employees this summer.

All products recommended by cafe-madrid have been selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories contain affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

More articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article